Psychology
382 reviews
Average Course Reviews:
Average Instructor Reviews:
Professor Parker teaches the topics in an easy to digest lecture format. I never felt like I was drowning or that I didn't understand the material. Tests are on what was taught in class. You don't have to read the book to do well on the exam but the book is extremely helpful for reinforcing material and for practice problems. You can find a free pdf of the book on Middfiles
Gurland is a lovely person and great teacher - she really loves her stats and knows her stuff. Her exams are very difficult but she is very approachable and will help. The Labs are fairly easy and are good places to score. If you have prior knowledge of stat or a passion for it, you will be fine but if you don't I would say form a study group - it can get quite tricky to study alone. Her practice exams are decent. Overall, she was a pleasure to be taught by, she is very invested in her content and expects students to put in as much effort as she does (which is fair).
Gurland is a lovely person and great teacher - she really loves her stats and knows her stuff. Her exams are very difficult but she is very approachable and will help. The Labs are fairly easy and are good places to score. If you have prior knowledge of stat or a passion for it, you will be fine but if you don't I would say form a st …Read more
Arndt was a great lecturer. He was clear and enthusiastic. However, it seemed like took pride in having a class that it was extremely hard to get an A in. He showed this in the way he graded his exams and tests, did not make expectations clear, and weighted the grading heavily towards the exams and papers and away from things like participation. He was also extremely unacomodating when it came to late work. If you are purely interested in psychology and just want to learn as much as possible, Arndt is the best professor to take. If you want your grades to reflect your understanding of the material and be consistent with the standards in other classes, I would advise against it.
Arndt was a great lecturer. He was clear and enthusiastic. However, it seemed like took pride in having a class that it was extremely hard to get an A in. He showed this in the way he graded his exams and tests, did not make expectations clear, and weighted the grading heavily towards the exams and papers and away from things like pa …Read more