History
532 reviews
Average Course Reviews:
Average Instructor Reviews:
This was professor Strtaks first year and I think it led to the course being easier than usual. Exams weren’t cumulative and there was no final exam so there was no external motivation to pay attention in class for the second half of the semester. She is very passionate and appreciates if you go to office hours, especially to discuss papers.
Really interesting course with interesting readings and discussions. Mostly lecture based with fair exams that rely on the lectures. Classic old school history course that you get out what you put into. Generally fair grading and easy to get an A if you play along and do the work and readings.
The course is good if you are genuinely interested in the formulation of the Chinese civilisation, which should be in itself interesting. However, you are exposed to secondary sources mostly. The only major primary source you will encounter is the Analects, perhaps parts of Mencius. It is thus more history than philosophy. Exams are weird but always doable if you actually study and understand what you are learning. Confucius should not be hard to understand, only hard to practice. Personally, my most pleasant experience in the class was with the final paper, since I got to pick my own research topic. Overall, even though it is a 300-level class, and is reputed to be difficult, it still touches very little at the depth and intrigue of the Chinese culture. Consider it a survey course, rather than a mind-reforming one.
The course is good if you are genuinely interested in the formulation of the Chinese civilisation, which should be in itself interesting. However, you are exposed to secondary sources mostly. The only major primary source you will encounter is the Analects, perhaps parts of Mencius. It is thus more history than philosophy. Exams are …Read more