HIST01032 months ago

I think Burnham is a very good historian but she's a bit scattered. We don't get our projects back promptly, nor our tests. She also is not the greatest at responding to emails. There's a lot of random assignments that aren't particularly interesting. It's a semi easy class for a distribution requirement though.

Lots of HomeworkDifficult Exams
3hrs / week Average difficulty Low value Would not take again
HIST01033 months ago

Burnham loves European history, but she is so disorganized that it's impossible to follow lectures. Her Canvas page is super confusing. She also assigns Inquizitive textbook readings quizzes every week, which seem pretty useless. The material is pretty worthless and is focused on memorizing small details of random events. Super super disorganized.

Fast-PacedFair GradingEasy Exams
3hrs / week Average difficulty Very low value Would not take again
HIST02423 months ago

I thought the material would have been interesting if it has been taught in a more concise manner. The lectures jumped around from topic to topic following an unclear pattern and were not in chronological order, which I feel a history class should be. Because of this, I found the material difficult to follow and draw connections between.

Chill and RelaxedFair GradingEasy Exams
2hrs / week Average difficulty Low value Would not take again
Login to access 1 more reviews of Louisa Burnham