Don Wyatt
Prof. Wyatt gave a lot of reading in this 400-level reading seminar. The final exam and paper consisted a large portion of the grade and required a decent amount of recall to earlier sections of the course. Essays were pretty fairly graded.
The course is good if you are genuinely interested in the formulation of the Chinese civilisation, which should be in itself interesting. However, you are exposed to secondary sources mostly. The only major primary source you will encounter is the Analects, perhaps parts of Mencius. It is thus more history than philosophy. Exams are weird but always doable if you actually study and understand what you are learning. Confucius should not be hard to understand, only hard to practice. Personally, my most pleasant experience in the class was with the final paper, since I got to pick my own research topic. Overall, even though it is a 300-level class, and is reputed to be difficult, it still touches very little at the depth and intrigue of the Chinese culture. Consider it a survey course, rather than a mind-reforming one.
The course is good if you are genuinely interested in the formulation of the Chinese civilisation, which should be in itself interesting. However, you are exposed to secondary sources mostly. The only major primary source you will encounter is the Analects, perhaps parts of Mencius. It is thus more history than philosophy. Exams are …Read more
This course was intellectually rewarding but quite challenging. The instructor set high expectations, grading was rigorous, and earning top marks required consistent effort and strong analytical writing. While demanding, the feedback was thoughtful, and students who stayed engaged gained a deep understanding of the material.